DEFENDING LIBERTY

2025 Regular Session

The bills below were selected based on their movement through committees.

Note:

  • ‘N’ means neutral: no definitive position, lacks further explanation.
  • Page will be updated routinely.

House bills:

   
HB 2125opposeIt allows for more welfare.
HB 2302opposeIncluding individual under 18 years old to ORS 124.100, would open the door of lawsuits against parents.
HB 2456  
HB 2461N 
HB 2461supportIt could make remote testimony easier in some instances.  
HB 2463N 
HB 2464NNo substantive changes
HB 2464supportIt supports the role of the government; protecting individual rights
HB 2467opposeThis bill could potentially allow the court to lock them up for 30 days for merely threatening.
HB 2533N 
HB 2570supportOSHA should be dissolved. However added privacy for businesses is positive.
HB 2747NWith its fiscal impact on taxpayers, a justification for the bill has not been provided yet. .
HB 2800NNo substantive change
HB 2802opposeIt places a burden on the insurer
HB 2819opposeIt enables the enforcement officer to issue citations for violations without required verification.
HB 2916NLacks sufficient information for evaluation
HB 2926NLacks sufficient information for evaluation
HB 2933N 
HB 2935NWith its fiscal impact on taxpayers, a justification for the bill has not been provided yet.
HB 3021NHas minimal fiscal impact. We oppose the program itself
HB 3022NHas minimal fiscal impact. We oppose the program itself
HB 3024opposeIt increases welfare (unemployment benefit)
HB 3070NWith its fiscal impact on taxpayers, a justification for the bill has not been provided yet. .
HB 3195opposeIncreases a welfare program
HB 3196opposeThe VOCA program was federally funded by non-taxpayers money, which was tripled in the recent years. This bill expends Oregon’s tax-payers money to backfill reductions. We oppose any spending of taxpayers money unless absolutely necessary.
HB 3198NWith its fiscal impact on taxpayers, a justification for the bill has not been provided yet. .

Senate Bills:

Bill numberPositionReason
SB 15supportIt aims to to reflect changes in market value.
SB 161opposeIncreases spending. It awards $5 millions to3 organizations.
SB 166NNo substantive change
SB 168NRequires further evaluation
SB 225supportCut taxes of pensions paid
SB 230N 
SB 249opposeThe directive is very broad, which could mean everything falls under the mental health label. High risk of wasteful spending, with potential of legislative interference in patient/doctor relationship.
SB 347opposeWhen the product is legal in Oregon, there should be no penalties imposed for producing it.
SB 376NThe definition is acceptable. Nevertheless it pertains to a welfare program, which we oppose on principle
SB 379supportExemption from some taxation
SB 387SupportProperty tax exemptions are always welcomed
SB 388supportIt increases oversight. It could lead to reduce welfare.
SB 397NRequires further evaluation
SB 425opposeInterferes between the merchant and the buyer. The idea behind the bill appears to be fair, however, the market itself can fix it if there is a need for it.
SB 430opposeIt adds more regulations on online sellers. It interferes between the seller and the buyer. It might raise the prices.
SB 463supportHas minimal fiscal impact. We oppose the program itself. Nevertheless, this bill could lead to serious reforms.
SB 466opposeGives money from the general fund to a non-profit
SB 481opposeIt adds more regulations on some businesses. Interferes  between employees and employers with penalties.
SB 493supportIt removes a government restriction for patient care
SB 505N 
SB 520N 
SB 538opposeWhile the well meaning intentions are appreciated, such charitable action must not be paid with money obtained by force from taxpayers.
SB 549opposeIt eliminates a requirement before spending taxpayers money on a welfare program
SB 56opposeIt forces insurances and assistance programs to cover costs of certain procedure .
SB 569opposeExpands welfare spending based on racial criteria. Discrimination based on race. Divisive.
SB 588NThe need is not clearly understood to us.
SB 596opposeUnnecessary spending
SB 605N 
SB 651supportIt can reduce regulatory burden on businesses
SB 667supportIt forces Congress to uphold the Constitutions by adding a legal barrier to violating the Wars Powers Act and Art.1 Sec.8. It restricts the ability to wage unconstitutional wars.
SB 668opposewelfare
SB 676NIn principle we oppose interference in interest rates, nevertheless this bill asks no more than what is within the average of market value
SB 69opposeRequires to study opposed already existing rules. It might add more regulation on employers and employees.
SB 699opposeThe well intentions are appreciated but the expenses cannot be coerced by government intervention
SB 718opposeExpands OHA. Adds more burden to health care providers. It will lead to more spending.
SB 731supportPay fairness where it is applicable for public employees.
SB 748supportIt reduces welfare spending by excluding undeserved persons.
SB 761NWith its fiscal impact on taxpayers, a justification for the bill has not been provided yet.
SB 798SupportIncentive for military service
SB 801NWith its fiscal impact on taxpayers, a justification for the bill has not been provided yet.
SB 803  
SB 806NNo objections in principle. Potentially good.
SB 807supportIncentives to reenlist or extends service.
SB 808  
SB 813supportIt simplifies an existing process.
SB 834N 
SB 846NNo substantive change
SB 849NNo clear benefit is understood.
SB 851NRequires further evaluation
SB 852NIt has no apparent fiscal impact.
SB 856supportGambling is not recommended, however less government restrictions, the better off everyone is.
SB 858NHas minimal fiscal impact. We oppose the program itself which is a mandatory tax on employees and employers to fund pay leaves.
SB 859NHas minimal fiscal impact. We oppose the program itself which is a mandatory tax on employees and employers to fund pay leaves.
SB 864opposeMore regulations on businesses.
SB 865opposeNo to more regulations
SB 87opposeExpands government bureaucracy and powers.
SB 879supportIt reduces welfare spending minimally.
SB 916opposemore welfare spending
SB 959supportThe definition applies.